The following post is written in response to the Governments much stated ambition to rapidly adopt AI and become a world leader in AI.
With ChatGPT now at version 5.5 — and entire articles being written wholly by GPT-5 with zero human input — the integration of Artificial Intelligence into the classroom is no longer a dystopian prospect or sci-fi gimmick. It is a reality fundamentally reshaping how children learn, at a pace that demands urgent, dynamic leadership. Yet as AI accelerates, it’s also carving out a massive, unequal chasm between independent and state schools.
Pioneering private schools have spent years experimenting with advanced tools like Merlyn Mind and Google Workspace. National policy for the state sector, by contrast, has remained reactive, underwhelming, and stuck in the mud. If we want to fix this, the Department for Education needs to stop producing dense white papers and start learning from how the private sector built its trailblazing culture.
A Head Start That’s Becoming a Chasm
Independent schools had a massive advantage. Many were operating as digital laboratories long before ChatGPT arrived. Some have used AI-powered digital assistants since 2021 — treating them as “extra adults in the room” to handle admin and free teachers for what matters most. They’ve even introduced safe, curriculum-aligned AI to younger pupils, building early tech literacy.
Combined with infrastructure built on platforms like Google Workspace over a decade ago, the results are stark. According to the Sutton Trust’s 2025 research, private school teachers are significantly ahead in adoption, training, and strategy.
Private schools are three times more likely to have a clear AI strategy than state schools (27% vs 9%). Private teachers are more than twice as likely to have received formal AI training (45% vs 21%), and they report higher confidence and more sophisticated usage — from pupil reports to marking and parent communication.
Meanwhile, the state sector faces a severe strategy deficit. A staggering 91% of state school teachers say their school has no clear, unified AI strategy. Without direction, AI use becomes fragmented — mostly quick lesson planning rather than the deeper administrative and pedagogical transformation seen in the independent sector.
Training, Hardware, and the Home Access Gap
Even well-intentioned peer training in state schools hits a wall: hardware and access. Independent schools often provide 1:1 devices, while many pupils from lower socio-economic backgrounds lack a reliable laptop at home for personalised AI tutoring.
The government’s response has centred on platforms like Aila through Oak National Academy — a well-meaning, safe, and free tool designed to reduce workload and meet DfE safety standards. It’s a solid start for consistency and equity of access. But it risks becoming a rigid, “Big Mac” solution: highly processed, one-size-fits-all content in a world demanding creativity and flexibility. Tools like Canva Magic Studio or Google AI Studio, used more freely in private settings, offer greater dynamism.
We’re essentially waiting for an educational Jamie Oliver to point out that algorithmic Turkey Twizzlers alone won’t nourish the next generation.
Culture Eats Strategy
There’s a famous management adage: “Culture eats strategy for breakfast.” It has never been more relevant. Bridget Phillipson and the DfE can issue all the top-down mandates, toolkits, and guidance they like. Without fostering genuine empowerment, experimentation, and professional trust, state schools will continue to fall behind.
Independent schools didn’t succeed because of a government memo. They empowered “digital champions,” invested in peer-to-peer training, and did the messy work of navigating data privacy, bias, and integration over years.
Time for Leadership, Not Lagging
We don’t have time for more white papers. With GPT-5.5 demonstrating capabilities once thought years away — including fully autonomous, hours-long complex workflows — education needs dynamic leadership and informed stewardship right now.
If the Secretary of State genuinely wants AI to be a gap-closer rather than an engine of deeper inequality, she should look beyond the political divide and treat trailblazing independent schools as partners, not opponents.
Practical steps could include:
- Funding cross-sector innovation pilots that let state schools adopt and adapt proven private-sector approaches.
- Greater procurement flexibility so schools aren’t locked into single national platforms.
- Targeted investment in devices and home access for disadvantaged pupils.
- Backing digital champions in every school with time, budget, and autonomy.
- Regulatory sandboxes that encourage safe experimentation while maintaining rigorous safeguards.
The alternative is clear: another generation watching the future being built on the other side of the school gates. It’s time to move from a policy of catching up to one of genuine leadership.
James Wilding
Google Certified Innovator
AFIS Patron













