So much of what we do in Education is ‘Lost in translation’, such that nice ideas get completely ruined when well meaning ‘experts’ turn them from an inspiring notion to a received wisdom that everyone has to follow and then be examined to test how well they learned the work.  The National Curriculum was such an idea, one whereby children in England could be guaranteed a minimum entitlement of subject coverage and breadth of opportunity. Prior to the late ’80s, what children studied in school varied quite widely until they chose their subjects for O levels or CSEs, and even then there was a pretty

Ken Clarke in the foreground, May 1991 © Neil Turner

wide range of educational experiences on offer. The arrival of GCSEs in 1986 meant that we could group all children under 1 banner at this higher level, and the rest of the National curriculum arriving pretty soon afterwards united the whole country. And then  the then Education Secretary Kenneth Clarke messed it all up by enforcing national testing from age 7. 25 years on, and the papers and news media run full pages talking about parents striking and children’s education and mental health suffering  because of the ‘straight-jacket’ of teaching to the test at primary school, implemented by teachers who fear for their jobs if their classes don’t perform to the required standards.

There’s a nice urban myth around which I like, very much along the ‘Lost in translation lines’, which goes as follows: Not even Quentin Tarantino has given a plausible explanation for the naming of his seminal gangster movie ‘Reservoir Dogs’, first screened back in 1992.

During Tarantino’s days working in Video Archives, a video store in Manhattan Beach, California, he developed encyclopedic knowledge of video films, and recommended films to his clients, including a film by Louis Malle, “Au revoir Les Enfants” , a fateful story set in a boarding school in occupied France  during the Second World War.  On trying to recall the film title later on, the name had morphed from ‘Au revoir les enfants’ to ‘Reservoir Dogs’.  There might be similar sound patterns, but the feeling the listener hears is dramatically different.  Reservoir Dogs is a 1992 American neo-noir crime thriller film that depicts the events before and after a botched dia

Oh, and everyone dies in it too!

mond heist. The film was the feature-length debut of director and writer Quentin Tarantino, and stars Harvey Keitel, Michael Madsen, Steve Buscemi, Chris Penn, Lawrence Tierney and Tim Roth. Tarantino and criminal-turned-author Edward Bunker have minor roles. It incorporates many themes that have become Tarantino’s hallmarks—violent crime, pop culture references, profanity, and nonlinear storytelling*.  

Closing this blog, just before our May half-term in 2016, I’ll stay with the Louis Malle film title of the myth above. The last thing I want  to see as children work through their primary years is a loss of the bright eyes and love for learning that I see each day in school.  It’s true children don’t mind being tested, so long as no-one uses the results of such testing to compare them with others and then ‘do them down’.  It’s certainly the case that in the wrong hands, children rapidly lose a love of learning, indeed leave their childhood and enter that early adolescent stage of choosing to be uncooperative because actually the classroom has nothing in it for their learning. Beware setting our young learners on the exit strategy ‘Goodbye, children’, because they’ll never recover that innocence of learning that permits children to try anything and attempt everything!

If you’d like to watch children being amazed by their own learning, please watch this video, ‘Austin’s butterfly‘.

If you want to watch an amazing deconstruction of why almost  everything education has tried over the last 20 years has failed, spectacularly, then please watch Professor Dylan Wiliam’s lecture at the Schools Network in 2011.  His talk opens with “If we are serious about improving education, we have to stop people doing good things” – definitely worth a watch.

*Wikipedia

In the main, this week’s post are not my words. I have encountered a remarkable cartoon film (see bottom of the blog), which captures the essence of the world’s ills in 26 letters of the Alphabet. What’s even more remarkable, is that this short film also breaks through all those taboos which otherwise I might find difficult to talk to parents and children about, or indeed write down in a blog such as this.

It seems that 757 million people cannot read my blog, not because they do not have access to the internet, because they do (Over 4 billion people have access to mobile phones, rather more than double the number who have access to running water, would you believe?). Sadly, they can’t read my words, because they can’t read. I’ve borrowed the following paragraphs from the http://www.projectliteracy.com/ website.

“Project Literacy is a global movement convened by Pearson* to make significant and sustainable advances in the fight against illiteracy so that all people – regardless of geography, language, race, class, or gender – have the opportunity to fulfill their potential through the power of words.  

Illiteracy is a global problem, stretching from the USA to Uganda, from Europe to Cambodia and everywhere in-between. It matters because these small tasks quickly become big problems. Illiterate people are more likely to be poor, they can’t get educated, can’t participate in political activities or help with economic development; and sadly their choices in life are far too limited.

Project Literacy brings together a diverse and global cross-section of people and organisations to help unlock the potential of individuals, families and communities everywhere with the power of words. Together, we will make significant and sustainable advances in literacy over the next five years so that by 2030, no child will be born at risk of poor literacy.

But we need your help, too, even if it’s just reading an article, sharing it with your friends and maybe making a pledge to get involved. It’s up to you; it’s up to all of us, to help make illiteracy a thing of the past.”

Anyway, settle yourself down, put the volume up and enjoy a compelling 2 minutes watch. If you are not moved to react, to make a difference quickly, I’d be very surprised. If only by sharing the information onwards, as I am doing by ‘posting’ today, you can add to world peace.  Now click on the picture and take relearn your alphabet.

Let’s make no bones about it though – if we can increase the literacy levels of the world by 100 million people, that’s 20% only of those who can’t read, we’d would do more for world peace than all the armies of the world could ever do.

“The Pen is Mightier than the Sword”

Edward Bulwer-Lytton

Pearson* – I am deeply indebted to Rod Bristow, President, Pearson Uk and his colleagues for introducing this initiative to ISA schools and other national organisations within Education this week.  Multinationals in a global world can easily acquire a tarnished reputation, but in creating an urgency around the need to raise base-line international literacy levels, I have no doubt Pearson’s intentions are entirely honourable. 

The following article is written to sit alongside a variety of secondary and sixth form assemblies I am giving currently about the rights of man and the needs for a civil society, and that they are not perhaps the same.

“Wherever law ends, tyranny begins.” These words, written by John Locke, philosopher, in 1689, begin a proposition around which all of us are reminded that we are under “the sovereignty of the law”.

It is by the customs and practices of the law that we all live and thrive, and just societies need the rule of law for justice and order to prevail.  This usually arises by the state ensuring that the judiciary are independent of its work, such that government can also be held accountable for its actions.

A just society also needs a dependable civil service, in order to provide and maintain a degree of services for society that provide order and safety. Taxes need to be paid reliably and honestly, traders held to account should they debase the flour or market dishonourably, and the rights of the individual balanced against the needs of the wider society. How houses and roads get built, new industries and technologies deployed are all part of a process that society needs to regulate. Within this civil service come things such as health services, education, community care and such like.

Of course we also require secure police  and armed forces, to ensure that internal and external threats to our ordered lives are managed and defended as aps appropriate. In many ways this is as important as the other two; uniformed forces may arise before the rule of law and the civil service, but they should not be diminished in the hope that we live in a perfect world, because we don’t.  As internal and external violence to our society are as evident now as they have ever been, we need authorised muscle to be available for our protection, and accountable of course should it exceed its authority.

2016 has continued the trend that ‘British Society’ is not as good as we would wish it to be.  The latest findings of the new inquest into the Hillsborough disaster published this week show that one of our police forces and the ambulance services of the day failed in their duty of care to protect those in attendance at the football match.  The report revealed “multiple failures” by other emergency services and public bodies that contributed to the death toll.  Many news organisations most notably the Sun and the Times acted disgracefully at the time, blaming drunken hooliganism as the cause and singling out Liverpool supporters specifically, and for a time we, the public, believed the headlines. I could say much more, or indeed point out other scandals still running, such as neglect of child abuse in many of our cities by the authorities, or the way national government has failed this nation of tax payers through permitting the offshoring of wealth by the richest and most powerful of individuals and corporations.  The latest High Street demise of BHS leaves us all with the very uncomfortable feeling that one man’s ocean-going liner is another 11,000 employees pension fund.

Back in 1987, Margaret Thatcher famously declared that there was no such thing as society, and that the rights of the individual were paramount. From that day onwards, our society has moved this way, to promote the rights of the individual, to the extent that we have seen really very rapid acceptance of new rights and accommodations that previously were unheard of.  Gay marriage and same-sex parenting are 2 obvious examples, and honestly I see these developments as being signs of a healthy society, not evidence of progress towards barbarism. All my adult life I have actively promoted the liberal rights agenda, been in membership of a political party that supported same (the Liberal Democrats) and funded my membership of Amnesty International and Greenpeace as a way of assisting the support of a more just world order and society.  Just now, I fear I have not influenced one agenda specifically strongly enough, that of the need above all to have a civil society.

In education, health, policing and the defence forces we are seeing the wholesale dismantling of the civic organisations that manage this provision for our local areas and nation as a whole, and the neutering of local and national parliament to have a say in such on-going provision. Much is being made of the national financial deficit we find ourselves in past the Banking crisis of 2007, but the solutions now being imposed are not fundamentally about cost savings.  The proposed academisation of all 28000 state schools is clearly much more expensive than leaving the schools where they are, for example.  The replacement of local and national control over police and education through the election of police and crime commissioners and the appointment of regional school commissioners encourages us to believe that individuals are better at managing our needs than organised groups of local citizenry, be they councillors or school governors. The transfer of our armed defence from paid professionals to a larger group of territorial volunteers is about cost saving of course, in the same way as may happen with the police or those in community care.  The removal of the rights of those poorest in our society to receive legal aid, or disability allowances from the disabled are in similar vein. What’s so confusing is that all is happening simultaneously, under the pretext that the elected government have the authority of a general election win. In reality, the victory was by the slimmest of margins, and those now in power are not choosing to recognise their responsibilities to represent all in the country not just the minority that voted for them.

At a time when so much of our civil and ordered society is under threat from those whose vision is blighted by their own rhetoric and prejudices, I for one feel it important to make public and constant my serious objections to the appalling speed at which change without evidence is being wrought on our communities.  There are indeed good and noble members of parliament in government today, and their voices of dissent are audible.  The Select committees and House of Lords are doing their best to hold the executive to account, bringing back for inspection and scrutiny matters that need just that, but the Parliamentary year is not actually long enough to cover the 52 weeks of ‘collar’ feeling’ we need.

It is interesting to note just how many state and independent fellow professionals are highlighting that the current tyranny of ‘Do as you’re told’ by our executive government is causing great damage.  3 decades ago when the police were not the transparent organisations they are becoming now, both the newspapers and the public at large took hookline and sinker the story those in power wanted us to believe. Likewise now, a new tyranny hell-bent on change at all costs is trying to remove the scrutiny of the ‘law’ on its works. Parents to be removed from school governance, services to be distanced from the local authorities, employees to be redunded from the civil service to disempower it – I could go on and on.

Another of John Locke’s quotes is “We are like chameleons, we take our hue and the color of our moral character, from those who are around us.” I know we need a powerful citizenship working within a civic society that does it duties for those therein.  It was the case 327 years ago and is still this day.  Locke was writing at the outset of the Age of Enlightenment during the 18th Century – Wikipedia reminds us that the Enlightenment included a range of ideas centered on reason as the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and came to advance ideals such as liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government and ending the perceived abuses of the church and state. Here’s hoping a sense of reason resurges across the country over forthcoming weeks and months; choosing the dismantle the UK’s agreed structures with its partners in Europe would be another disaster in the making, and at least in that regards we have some political leadership on show!

And finally…

The graph above identifying the arrival of the term ‘screenager’ in literature shows just how modern a term it is. The peak in the early noughties might be attributable to the popularity of the band ‘Muse’ and their song of the same title published in 2001. As the Oxford English dictionary explains, the phrase is used to describe that  human aged between 13 and 25, and identifies that in recent decades they have become connected 24/7 to the emotional world around them through the screens they carry in the palms of their hand.

Across the pond in the United States, a major and remarkable new film is doing the rounds, limited to responsible screenings in school halls, community centres and such like, so that families can attend and take on board the powers and dangers now confronting all with the ubiquitous technology of ‘screens’.  The film ‘Screenagers’  (trailer)   was made by Dr Delaney Ruston, who decided to make it to affirm the importance of helping children find balance in our tech filled world. The film provides a vehicle to bring parents, educators and children together for post screening discussions so change can happen not just in our homes but in our schools and communities.

“Screenagers is a very balanced, sympathetic and sane look at the way millions of teens are struggling with phones and games and technology in general. In part by letting the teens themselves speak about their own concerns and solutions, Screenagers is deeply affecting, too.”  Dave Eggers, Best-Selling Author, Publisher and Education Activist

I have read  a lot around this subject, though not yet watched the film, and have requested of Dr Ruston permission to show ‘Screenagers’ here in the UK at Claires Court. American schools and communities face difficulties some years ahead of us, often because their technology moves ahead of ours in terms of pace and opportunity (high-speed broadband and 3G for example). The film’s impressive testimonials highlight that it would add well to the mix of advice and support we already offer parents, by providing for the whole family an opportunity to discuss the  problems our young people face, and seek solutions actually which otherwise won’t be found.

During the teenage and early twenties’ years, we are most alive emotionally, when heart rules head and impulsive behaviour is rapidly rewarded by social ‘high-fives’ and  peer encouragement.  It is at this time that we are most susceptible to our first real burst of clinical  depression, and 50% of us will suffer such mental illness by age 25. The picture is worse for girls, with the female gender suffering by a 2:1 ratio.   Those who ‘catch’ depression early, say by age 13, are more likely to have repeat bouts, each more serious than the previous.  On each occasion those who suffer feel they are the cause of their problem and don’t want to bother their parents with their issues.  In short, not receiving treatment the first time lends itself to repeat bouts in the near future.

In my own school community, we do everything we can to promote positive  mindsets in our young people. Physical activity is an impressive antidote to feelings of low esteem. Our pro-social behaviour approach, school values, emphasis on education not examination, drop-in counselling and engagement with talking, mindfulness and willingness to challenge irrational beliefs are all ways we seek to identify early those who might be struggling with mental illness.  Food is available throughout the day, and one should never undervalue the importance of cake in our lives (and we don’t). Honestly, we try to be the school with a smile on its face every minute of every day.

The trouble is, this is not enough. Teenagers feel emotions really strongly, far more personally than we as adults. As our school’s values guru, Margaret Goldthorpe reminds us every time she visits, it’s almost inevitable we adults disempower and demotivate the young people around us.  Parents and teachers seem so very successful, cool and in control, and whilst children admire that, often they don’t feel able to come up to our expectations. We may offer them affirming homes and relationships with adults, but  as they crave independence to learn this for themselves, they are confronted in the flesh and on screen by endless examples that they are  not up to ‘scratch’.  This negative propaganda about teenage failure is absolutely everywhere, perhaps even promulgated by my writing this blog. The politicians who talk about education and our schools continue to highlight just how ‘weak’ our children are in comparison with their peers in other countries, and guess what, our children take that on board and stress about it lots.  Just look at today’s stories of headteachers ‘quitting’ because of ‘factory farming’ pupils, whilst our Prime Minister defends controversial plans to force all state schools in England to become academies, saying it is time to “finish the job”.  Honestly what job – the destruction of our children’s mental health perhaps?

The initial cause of teenage mental turmoil comes from the stress the child’s emotional systems come under. These stressing agents include all forms of bullying and abuse, drugs such as alcohol and nicotine, as well as physical violence. Most of our children don’t face these, but other subtler forms cause almost as much stress. Simple nutrition has a massive impact upon the developing brain, and the memory box of the exercising 11 year old is bigger than that of their sedentary peer*.  Those who choose to diet increase the likelihood of cognitive impairments for similar reasons in their adolescent years. The aggressively hostile school, in which children have education done to them rather than be informed partners in their own learning provides a consistent non-validating environment, particularly to those who see themselves as vocational rather than academic learners. Sport is barely available, and the new state curriculum of academic ‘Progress 8’ subjects only exacerbates the loss of creative release in doing something for themselves. Other pressures such as exams, sexual identity, relationship difficulties, significant illness or loss of a friend or family members all start impacting upon mental well-being, and all these stressors cause the arrival of emotional turmoil, leading to depression.

Our brain has two main areas of cognitive function, the cortex which provides for the logical conscious brain, and the amygdala (part of the mid brain) which handles our emotional system. The neural systems connect far more  securely from amygdala to cortex than visa versa, so your logical brain can’t turn off your emotions. It’s even worse for the screenagers, because their neural systems start rearranging during this period so substantially that young people cannot even express in words how they feel!

We have ignored youth mental illness for years, because we have not fully understood its roots, and because actually in a loving family home and away from the social pressures of their peers, youngsters have been able to regress to childhood and be honest with their parents and family.  Those of us who have seen our children go through University and beyond still see the therapeutic effects that exists for our young adults as they come ‘home’.

This new ‘screenager’ period has seen the pressures grow much more rapidly, because of course the  ‘screen’ is always with them, constantly chirruping its siren call that on the other side better things are going on. And it’s not just passive viewing, but active social engagement and activity happening, often taking the user into risk-taking behaviours that cannot be ‘erased’.  It’s one thing to take a drink or ‘grope’ another behind the bike shed, quite another to ‘snap-chat’ a potential love interest with a permanent unsuitable picture.  As the latest survey of young lives highlights, the majority have engaged in such activities, leaving themselves vulnerable in so many ways.

I am full of admiration for this generation of young people. In the main, they are so much more conscious of the need to be healthy, to stay away from alcohol, tobacco and drugs.  They want to do well by school and family. When they are very young, so many have been presented with the screen, large and small, as a way to better themselves, find out more and become independent learners, as well as have fun and play games. None of us want to blame our young people for the predicament we are finding them in.  But hear you this; the epidemic of mental illnesses in the United States that triggered Dr Ruston to make her film last year is an object lesson to us all, a digital version of ‘Silent Spring’ which back in 1962 informed the world that the life saving, mosquito killing pesticides were quietly and lethally destroying our living world.  And if we are not careful, we are permitting the digital equivalent to happen in 2016; and it’s not the screen itself that’s the problem, but the relentless and needless escalation of unnecessary pressure of all kinds on children whose limbic systems simply are not up to the job, and can’t help but shut down.

*For a detailed exposition by an expert in this field, watch Dr Harry Barry’s Youtube lecture  – Depression and the Screenager

The human genome is a remarkable set of instructions that assists in enabling us humans to live in many climates, on many foodstuffs and to survive the predations of disease organisms large and small.  We know a vast amount about the human genome now, thanks to the amazing work of scientists across the globe, and Nobel prizes abound in the science of genetics.

We also know a very great deal about gene expression, and that work precedes our work on
the genome by a century. The Monk Gregor Mendel introduced the science of genetics through his work on pea plants in the 1850/60s, and over the subsequent 100 years we have learned a vast amount about how genes code for our many and various inherited characteristics. What Mendel and others never found out was t
hat we have way more instructions in our genome than we have cause to use. The genes are switched on (expressed) and off (silenced) by a whole host of environmental factors, and this has become increasingly importance in recent years this century as nutrition experts link the vital importance of diet to human health. An obvious example to give is that of alcohol tolerance; the gene that enables us to tolerate and digest alcohol is switched on and off dependent upon the presence of alcohol in our diet. Peanut and other worrying allergies do not seem to develop if very young children are exposed regularly to such foods during weaning.  When dieticians are asked “What’s the best food to eat?”, the best answer in reply is “Eat the rainbow!” – in other words, browse on the whole set of food stuffs and you can’t go wrong.

The ability of humans to process information, be that visual , auditory, tactile, through movement or taste is developed in the same ways. Wine or tea tasting are sets of skills developed around specific food stuffs. Great photographers and artists are fundamentally at home with the tools of their trade. Our latest sporting hero, Danny Willett, winner of the Masters 2016 and wearer of the Green jacket learned his golfing trade the hard way through endless practice, an appetite for hard work and a resolute competitive edge. And we know that as adults age and cease to use all of their mental faculties, their ability to process new information rapidly declines. Reintroduce physical and mental activities to a willing student and those signs of old age rapidly disappear.

Inevitably in education, the same is true. A balanced educational diet is essential to ensure children develop the best they can be.  And the diet really does need to be of the rainbow quality throughout the early, primary and secondary years, because we simply don’t know where our future lies in this uncertain world (which has been uncertain for decades by the way).  Here’s a 1940’s video from the states, extolling the virtues of the new progressive, hands-on education arising to provide America with the enquiring minds it needed for the new technological world arriving at the time.

Since this film was made, some 70 years have passed, and governments in the developed world have tinkered again and again with their educational provision, trying to industrialise it sufficiently well to ensure it gets the key workers in every discipline it needs to provide their country with an economic advantage over their competitors. The most successful countries, such as Singapore and Finland have worked out that ‘streaming’ and ‘testing’ are not going the bring the outcomes they are looking for. Breadth, diversity and depth, with the learners in control as much of the time as the teacher can make available are the ways forward.

As important as the content is, it’s the approach that matters more. Children are their best teachers and aids for their friends, from the age of 4 or 5. Here’s one of the more famous examples of the power of peer advice, Austin’s butterfly, from 2012 which exemplifies all that is best in how peer support works.  A school of 500 may have 50 teachers on the staff list, and all will feel stretched beyond bearing if they have to teach everything.  The reality is that such a school has 50+500 teachers, and the power that can be brought to bear when 550 support learning in a supportive way is evidenced by the great schools of our land.

So, this coming Summer term in Claires Court, we’ll continue to teach the rainbow of course;  we’ll look out for new colours we have yet to appreciate and we’ll aim to deploy everyone of us, from age 3 to 86 years of age to teach – and hopefully we’ll keep our learning genes switched on, and find a few more that have not yet been deployed!

At the end of my Sixth Form days, L.P.Hartley’s book, ‘The Go-between’, was made into a stunning film with its stars being the adorable Julie Christie and Alan Bates, adults in secret love linked by Leo Colston, their child messenger (the go-between) played by Dominic Guard.  I have seen the film quite a few times, but it’s the book’s opening lines that stay with me:

“The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.”

The story is set in pre-first world war England, when the upper class seldom sullied their hands, and is told by the now aged adult go-between as he recalls the events of his childhood.  The book really ought to be on everyone’s top 100 books for their desert island; we are all affected and repressed in some way by our childhood experiences and in the solitude of an Island life, we would be able to reflect upon the ‘what might have beens!’

As I write, Brussels is in lock down, and terrorist mayhem has been wrought upon innocent civilians at airport and train station.  If for no other reason than security, the borders of Europe are being closed, and plans to return hundreds of thousands of refugees back to the middle east are in an advanced stage of preparation. Our own political masters are at each others throats; this week’s multi shambles of a budget bringing the chancellor into disrepute, and has a secretary of state for work and pensions departing into the back-benches of parliament to fight his other cause ‘Brexit’.  We are now 100 days to the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, in which those who have a vote can shape our future very differently if they so wish.

In the same budget, George Osborne announced that all state schools were to become academies* by 2020, breaking completely the control that local authorities have had over our schools since the Education act of 1944 when secondary education became free in state schools. Whilst the majority of secondary schools are already academies, most primary schools are not, and the country simply does not have the expertise to fragment this junior provision whilst protecting the rights of those most vulnerable who cannot protect themselves. The chancellor said that the government’s goal was “to complete this schools revolution and help every secondary school become an academy” with power being in the hands of heads and teachers, “not bureaucrats”.

Given that we are in the middle of the largest simultaneous shake-up of public examinations, to be completed by 2018, this means that the entire English primary and secondary system is being turned on its head, fragmented and ‘rebranded’.  This is being done to ‘improve’ our education system.  The first results that will permit us to measure whether this change has worked won’t come out until 2025, and full evidence not until the 2020-25 cohorts are all the way through, meaning 2030.  Since the current government has a mandate until 7 May 2020, if they last this parliament that is, then I can honestly predict the educational landscape for the next 15 years is set to become the Wild West, in which anything can happen and probably will. I am not the only one that thinks this will be sad.

Back in November, all Roy Perry, the Conservative leader of Hampshire county council and chairman of the Local Government Association’s Children and Young People Board, could say was ‘If government were to say there is no role for local government in education that would be a sad day. I hope this does not become a political issue. Within Conservative-controlled councils we see ourselves as having a very positive and important role in education’.  This week  Fasna,  the body which represents self-governing schools and academies, questioned whether there was capacity to “execute that policy effectively”. I am sure they are right to challenge their masters, because the data shows that only 1 in 3 of academy schools are as good as they need to be, roughly in line with the LA average.

Though I suspect Christ’s resurrection story and the promise of redemption is the way to go for most of us, it’s time for my uplifting Easter message. I have become mindful of the acceleration of time in recent years, when everything is done for a purpose, a next step on our travels, which are often more ambitious and extensive than yesteryear. We are not workshy privileged adults from the past, playing games in a world where the harsh realities of life are far away. But we can at least recognise the need to find time to take a rest, to play around, enjoy our families and friends and have some fun, so please do.  You might even get a film out. The BBC remade the Go-between last year – I can’t source the movie but Youtube has a great trailer, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzVQhJ9Eyy4 , and as the film also has Jim Broadbent (the old Leo), it’s worth the watch just for the opening sequence in which he speaks ““The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.”

Do enjoy the Easter break, I will!

*P.S. Since writing this blog, ‘mumsnet’ has gone bonkers about the prospect of academisation;  in conservative party terms, this is spelled ‘a-cayman-isation’ – it appears that  Mr Cameron’s close friends are ‘trousering’ the real estate and off-shoring the nation’s educational assets into a tax haven.

When the Varkey Gems Foundation first announced the ‘Global Teacher Prize‘ in 2014, I for one was a little underwhelmed by the prospect. Given the nature of the world in crisis I thought, why focus on ‘teachers’ rather than perhaps peace makers or refugee workers. But the concept has grown on me, because it has undoubtedly surfaced huge differences in what makes a great teacher across the world, and has caused my profession to look more carefully at the devil in the detail.

There have been 2 winners so far, Nancie Atwell (English teacher, Maine, USA) in 2015 and Hanan Al Hroub (Primary specialist in supporting children traumatised by violence, West Bank, Palestine).  Their stories, and those of the other finalists can be read here, and the work more generally of the Global Education & Skills Forum here.

Sunny Varkey and his family have a huge business in schools, based in the middle East, known as GEMS Education, with some satellites around the world, including 5 schools and a nursery here in the UK. The philanthropic foundation chose to set up the annual Global Education & Skills Forum, and have funded it really well, UNESCO and the UAE support it and their lead speakers over the last 4 years have been out of the very top drawer. Pope Francis announced this year’s winner by video link, and Hanan Al Hroub’s supporters were able to watch live on the big screen in Ramallah.

There are some really key features that the finalists have in common; passion for learning, focus on the children and their outcomes, willingness to innovate and challenge, and really willing to share their work widely. And if you don’t believe me, read on – headlines include ‘space elevators’, ‘distance learning across the globe’, ‘refugee schools’, ‘maker culture for literature and films’, ‘free maths teaching videos for all’ , ‘social justice programmes for sex trafficked children’ and so forth.  Clearly none of the finalists set out to win this prize, and many of their personal life stories are quite extraordinary. For example, Robin Chaurasiya helped organise a successful campaign to change US armed forces policy after being forced to leave her position as an Air Force officer because of her sexuality. She changed profession, moved to Mumbai in India, and works within an NGO called ‘Kranti’ (Revolution) empowering marginalised girls in Mumbai’s red light district to become agents of social change.

Winning the prize does not mean the teachers can leave what they re doing – far from it, it secures their employment in their setting for the next 5 years!  Interesting to note that last year’s winner, the most amazing English teacher in the backwoods of Maine,  Nancie Atwell donated her prize to her school and their work to disseminate her innovative teaching methods.  And what’s fantastic is that the methods used by both winners are spreading across the world more rapidly because of the fame this prize has brought. Atwell’s pupils read an average of 40 books a year and probably write as many, such education providing a real antidote to the anti-academic nature of rural life in Maine.

More generally, the Varkey Foundation’s work is doing amazing things in creating thousands of new teachers in countries where they are in really short supply. Cutting to the chase, when teaching can make such a difference to children’s lives, sometimes 4 years training is a tad too long; they have developed an impressive 5 day intensive training programme for school leaders in Uganda.  Through working together, potential school leaders are empowered to break the ‘learn these facts rote learning’ mould and enable teachers and pupils to take responsibility for their learning and personalise it to fit needs and circumstance.

So the cynic in me has gone, to be replaced by a real sense of wonder that along side Messi, Adele, Brad Pitt and Jamie Oliver to name but 4 random celebrities renowned for their craft, we now have have some superstars of our own at whose work we can marvel and admire. Here at Claires Court we have some superstars of our own of course, but I suspect not yet any who have had the stretch and reach of the GTP finalists to date.  The thing is though, prizes are not what brought any of us into Education, but what such competitions have done, as indeed the Oscars before for so much longer, is find some unsung heroes and place them centre stage, for their work, for their craft and for the passionate endeavour which they bring to their work every day. And that’s a lesson for all in schools, be they adults or children – worth perhaps the spending of a million dollars!

Published today is a defining report published by ISC on the value added that independent schools offer by the Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring at the University of Durham. As a school, we have been using CEM centre benchmarking tools since the early 1990s, and right from the start at Reception age, we are able to ‘benchmark’ our children’s abilities using CEM centre tools.

Using PIPS though Key Stages 1 and 2 , our teachers are provided with an annual assessment in maths, literacy and developed ability and a prediction of progress.

In addition during the early years, we also use CEM centre’s suite of diagnostic tools known as InCAS, which provides detailed, age related  information and recommendations as the children progress through each year of education to age 11.

From age 11, we switch to CEM centres secondary suite of tools, starting with MidYIS for ages 12, 13 and 14, make use of YELLIS for Year 10 and 11, and on entry into the Sixth Form, we make use of the grandaddy tool of them all, ALIS, which assist in giving predictions for A level performance, using either developed ability scores (IQ to the lay person) or based on prior GCSE achievement.

So what does 25 years of experience using CEM centre tools bring to our provision at Claires Court. First and foremost, on average over the 25 years, we seem to improve children’s GCSE grades on average by just over half a grade, once the prior academic ability, deprivation, student’s gender, single sex and compositional variable are taken into account. In short, we match the Independent Sector’s average.  This difference equates to a gain of about two years’ normal progress and suggests that attending an independent school is associated with the equivalent of two additional years of schooling by the age of 16. Interpreting the difference on the scale of international PISA outcomes equates it to raising the UK’s latest PISA 2 results to be above the highest European performers, such as Finland, Switzerland and the Netherlands, and on a par with (or close to) countries such as Japan and Korea.

The thing is, we don’t just use the tools to give us selves a pat on the back. We use them to ‘diagnose’ each child’s skills, and in conjunction with other tools such as the Suffolk Reading test, then set about designing a child’s programme of study so that those weaknesses observed are given close support. The curricular programmes always include making use of different approaches to learning, such that everyone is always learning and making progress. I write this blog at the end of February, and next week we have 3 days of specialist intervention work with Year 8 (boys this time), building with them confidence in using summarising and flagging tools.

The really important thing we know about developing a child’s set of skills and talents is to focus on what needs improving, and not to attach blame around the process.  The  most important word for children to learn is ‘YET’. I can’t manage long division YET – which leaves the child open to the concept that they will get there soon.

CEM centre’s report is a really important one to read, but what it does not report is that we already know the national picture for the cognitive mindset of 11 and 12 year olds is looking bleak. I wrote about this almost 2 years ago in April 2014:

“New research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and conducted by Michael Shayer, Professor of applied psychology at King’s College, University of London, concludes that 11- and 12-year-old children in year 7 are “now on average between two and three years behind where they were 15 years ago”, in terms of cognitive and conceptual development”.  

As many of those who work with me at Claires Court know, I am deeply concerned that the current DfE trajectory is making a bad situation worse for its schools. Changing all the public exams in the country all at once, making all those public examinations harder at a rate of change that teachers cannot keep up with is already threatening strike action from headteachers for Key stage 1 and 2 in state primary schools. Just last month, the expected standard for Year 6 children in English were published. Instead of setting the bench mark at a (old) level 4, the suggestion is that it will be set at (old) mid level 5. This is the academic standard of a good Year 8 child. Today’s TES carries the bleakest of warnings from Russell Hobby, the leader of the largest of the 2 headteacher associations, the NAHT.

‘Education faces a crisis of measurement due to dramatic exam and assessment reform, and as a result we will make bad decisions, invest in the wrong initiatives, punish the wrong schools and make inaccurate statements about the performance of regions.’

Anyway, let’s get back to the good news for those whose education is set within the Independent Sector. International research, validated by one of the world’s most experienced educational institute has confirmed this week that children at whatever age in those independent schools that have chosen to use CEM centre tools to baseline,

Eleanor Wood

monitor and evaluate the educational provision are doing as well as the best performing countries  in the world. And in addition, we are demonstrating in so many other ways that our children go on to excel in later life. Here’s the Sutton Trust research on the success our sector enjoys in the Arts. Current former Claires Court people to watch: Matt Polley, lead singer of The Wild Lies, actor Ali Bastian, video editor Rupert Houseman, Film director Toby Hefferman and author Eleanor Wood.  This is not a story about privilege and silver spoon upbringing, but of diligent investment by parents (of finance) and teachers (of skills and pedagogy) and of the individuals concerned just keeping going when every sane person would have given up.

And not being judged and told that they were not good enough…but learning the lesson that they are not good enough YET!

The full quote by Professor Dame Carol Black is: “If you’re leading an organisation, your job is to guide it, care for it, protect it as best you can and try to make sure good things happen to it.”  She is Principal of Newnham College, Cambridge, and is a special adviser to the Department of Health and Public Health England. She is also Chair of the Board of the Nuffield Trust, the health policy think tank. She is only the second woman to be President of the Royal College of Physicians. I listened to her on Desert Island discs last week and was riveted by what she had to say about health in the workplace. http://goo.gl/1bmXzn 

I love her recall of her early life in Barwell, Leicestershire: “Perhaps my earliest achievement was to defy limited family expectations – I was meant  to stay living in my hometown and work in a shoe factory or a shop, but I had a stubborn belief that more was possible.” And Dame Carol has done so much more that ‘stay at home’. Even now in her ’70s, she runs 3 miles every day and travels the world. I hope the children in our school seek such challenges as well.

She makes it clear that if we wish to have a healthy workplace, the employer and their line managers need to care, be positive about their colleagues and provide good coverage for both medical and mental health issues that might arise. This chimes very well with the planning work our medical staff and I are on currently. We have full first aid cover and nursing advice on all 3 sites throughout the week, and in our well qualified nurses we have an extraordinary resource of which perhaps we could make even better use.

For example, whilst we have HPV2 vaccinations arranged for our girls in Year 8 for 19 April, as yet our boys are not provided with the same opportunity to acquire immunity to this killer disease. I quote from the NHS website: “All girls aged 12 to 13 are offered HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccination as part of the NHS childhood vaccination programme. The vaccine protects against cervical cancer.” As we hope all of our pupils are going to be ambitious with their careers, and at least travel some part way around the world, inoculating boys against HPV2 looks a smart idea. As much as half the UK population will be infected during their lifetime, so ensuring the 50% that are male are vaccinated will not just reduce overall infection rates, but also ensure that our males in their futures won’t catch and infect others in communities elsewhere in the world who are less well served than our children.  And it not just other that are likely to be protected – plenty of other human cancers look as though they are stimulated by HPV viruses and we are learning all the time about these other forms of cancer.

It’s not just physical health either that schools are concerned by, as many regular readers will know. Dr Susan Wimshurst is our visiting clinical psychologist, charged with providing both advice and support across all sites. Dr Wimshurst visits twice a term, and in addition we have full triage facilities with her practice at Everlief, so we can seek urgent support really quite rapidly. For our country, this is a real live issue; here’s journalist Dominic Hughes on the matter for the BBC – “Mental health care is so poor and underfunded that “lives are being ruined”, a review in England says. The report, by a taskforce set up by NHS England, said too many people were getting no help or inadequate care.” Watch more here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35576774

Anyway, back to Dame Carol. “I was very bad at taking risks with my working life – for the first 50 years, I was not very good at that!”

So to us that listen, young or old, that’s a mental note for us all – think a little bigger about what we could do next. Oh, and if we lead a business – try to make good things happen!

Just dropped onto my desk is some useful guidance from  the Boarding Schools Association, with regards to the Zika virus, new arrival on the scene as a major health concern across the world. Almost all the major health developments we have seen over the last 200 years have resulted initially from major infrastructure projects that bring drainage, sewage treatment, potable water, appropriate food supplies for all and such like. Alongside the infrastructure build has come vaccinations, for smallpox, polio, measles, mumps, whooping cough and a litany of others that help protect us just enough to give us both immunity and a healthy immune system.

The effects of Zika are almost Orwellian in their darkness, having little effect on the adult but disastrous effects on the unborn child. Now the link between Zika virus and microcephaly is not proven as yet, but the circumstantial evidence is worryingly close. The placenta is the most amazing organ, protecting the unborn child from a very great deal of ‘junk’ in the mother’s bloodstream, but it does seem as though the smallest particulate life-form known to man can makes it way through and cause irreparable damage.

It’s worth noting that the arrival of penicillin and the other antibiotics has given us breathing space of about seventy years before the bacteria have found a way of growing resistance to them – suddenly we are back to basics, requiring fantastic sterile techniques to ensure we can secure operating theatres and sick bays from such superbugs. It’s interesting to note that some cancers have found a way of by-passing the chemicals designed to obliterate them in like manner, but due to the amazing work of the Royal Marsden and major research centres in the states, we are learning how to stimulate the body’s own immune system to fight active cancer cells. This pioneer work is perhaps 20 years old now, accelerating over the last 3, and is bit by bit making a huge difference to some of the most invasive cancers we know, such as Melanoma.

To summarise part 1 of this blog; thank goodness we have public health and research and medicine and all that medical jazz, without which many of us would not have made it through to now. However the dangers are real and ever present, and we need to be vigilant and show no complacency. Probably the most amazing thing of all is that not only can humans consciously do something to make the world healthier, but their body immune systems can as well, unconsciously. It’s how we are built.

Todd Rose is the Director of the Mind, Brain and Education program at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. His book, The End of Average has just been published (£20, Allen Lane) and it’s a ripping 196 page-turning read. Daniel Pink, a man who most in the world take really seriously about what motivates us to succeed writes this on the back cover of the book “Todd Rose has taken the latest findings from a new era of science, the science of the individual, to show that our one-dimensional understanding of achievement has seriously underestimated human potential. This book is readable, enlightening, and way above average…”

U.S. National archives/The Associated Press File photo

Don’t get me wrong, I love the book. Everything in it we already try to deploy within Claires Court. The science behind the book is this: Try as hard as you like, there is nothing that fits average. If you measure the dimensions of 15,000 women across 9 measures, and create an ‘normal’ woman, you’ll not find one whose normal. If you measure 140 dimensions of 4000 USAF air force fighter pilots and create an average, the number that match the average is a big fat zero.
You can read the fascinating detail of these late 1940s studies here in the Toronto star.

I have always feared that the concept of equal opportunity is deeply flawed, as this really well-known cartoon shows. If only everyone was a monkey, climbing trees would be a breeze. And for humans, equal opportunity works until gender, nationality, colour, money, privilege kicks in. Despite us liberals’ best efforts, social mobility is worse now than ever before. And the main reason why of course is that we expect everybody to fit a set of rules that have become harder and harder to fit. So instead of seeking equality of opportunity, we need to concentrate on equality of fit; as there is no such thing as average, we’ll never create children to match a one-size fits-all template.

There is a lot written about building resilience in children so that they can experience the slings and arrows of education and social pressures without suffering. Honestly, we have this right now within the greatest nursery school and family settings. Ideal is 5 mornings of social educative play, coupled with 5 afternoons of more personal contact in smaller groups, ideally with a loving parent.  We can substitute the latter by ensuring the afternoon context of nursery is not the same as the morning, but the development of close relationships between child and adult homemaker are essential. It is extraordinary in so many schools just how quickly the child’s socialisation has to become a fit for very tight boundaries of compliance. In the wrong kind of classroom, things can go very slowly indeed. As a wordpress friend, Edna Sackson writes in her blog today, “How much time do you spend shushing twenty-four children while one child speaks?”  There’s no need to run a class where the vast majority of learners are inactive and learning how to do nothing.

Giant footprints at CC

Children need expressive arts as part of their diet, they need sport and physical education, they need to paint and draw and create and above all do things that enable them to explore, take risks, do things differently and through those experiences and failures find out the things they can do really well.  And amazingly as all we adults know, since every adult is unique, if they have unique skills and talents to match, then they’ll

Spell making at CC

always thrive in our society.  But what happens if their school life does not give them this diverse diet?  Does it really matter, so long as they get the grades to make the next step in their education?  Surely a bit of tough love, straight and narrow education never hurt anyone in their formative years?

So here’s the scientific evidence from the USAF study on pilot ‘fit’. As planes rolled off the production line, the cockpit was fitted out to the dimensions of ‘average pilot size’, and the pilots were made to fit the plane. And of course, since no-one actually was the average size, the ‘fit’ was not great. As the demands got tougher, the job got harder in the dawn of jet-powered aviation.  The planes were faster and more complicated to fly, the problems with handling them were so frequent and involved so many different aircraft that the air force had an alarming, life-or-death mystery on its hands. At its worst, on one day 17 pilots were killed. Once their researcher, Lt. Gilbert S. Daniels was put on the case, his findings were clear: Daniels published his findings in a 1952 Air Force Technical Note entitled The “Average Man”? In it, he contended that if the military wanted to improve the performance of its soldiers, including its pilots, it needed to change the design of any environments in which those soldiers were expected to perform. The recommended change was radical: the environments needed to fit the individual rather than the average.

Not only did the USAF listen and change, so did every other engineering industry as well. Imagine what it would  be like to drive your car with the seat and steering wheel settings at the opposite end of your fit. Imagine being too low in the seat and having to drive at high speed through chicanes? You’d stop at once, rather than risk life and limb.

Well one industry in the Western World has chosen not to follow the scientific evidence base, and that is Education. There are institutional outriders such as Claires Court, where the sheer longevity and commitment of teaching staff to do ‘the right things the right way’ means we work to fit the school to the child, and we know how to do that now to the ‘nth degree. But in the mainstream, sadly, the industrialisation of education and the short-termism of ministerial tenure has changed the focus toward narrow assessment and teaching to the test. Another american researcher, this one from the sixties, John Holt discovered for children that which Daniels discovered a decade earlier for pilots. There is no such thing as average, so teaching children so they can achieve an average mark is doomed to failure. Together with his colleague, Bill Hull, Holt moved the emphasis on his teaching to concepts and active learning, and spotted that the ‘better’ students were solely those who were able to forget what they had learned after the test rather than before. Wikipedia covers John Holt’s work really well, as of course did all the teacher training colleges back in the day … until they were shut down in the ’90s in favour of short-and-sharp post-graduate work-place learning where success has been monetised by performing to the test and rising your school up the performance tables.

The health of our children is the most precious of things to our parents, as it was in the fifties.  Whilst in the USAF there were of course plenty of pilots who did survive flying their machines, so many men ‘crashing and burning’ was too high a cost to bear. Likewise now in 2016, whilst the epidemic of adolescent mental health problems continues to escalate across the country, we can still see plenty of signs that students are doing well at school, passing their exams and getting the best jobs. Of course like the pilots, some can cope, but the cost to our society is unacceptable. Current experts in childhood mental health, such as Professors Tanya Byron and Sarah-Jayne Blakemore bang on about this time and again. Children need a massive balance between play, education and nurture, and the ‘fit’ needs to be ‘personal’. This choice to wrap education around the child is a mindset, which dedicated professional teaching staff know. Tailoring to the child works best. And even government knows this: “Every child matters!”

And guess what, not only will children grow in every sense of the word consciously, engaged with their school and education and mastering the most complex of skills, with lots of effort and quite a lot of failing too along the way. And that broad diet of work shaped around their needs means that their unconscious health is looked after as well. They develop the resilience to their mental health as much as they do with their immune system. Amazingly, it’s how we are built.

Alternatively, you can believe in what our Ministers for Education feel about educational ‘fit’.

The “purpose of education” is to enable people to read academic texts and appreciate the theatre.

Schools minister Nick Gibb